Question by Abdullah Bey | Source

Answer:

Moors' use of the term "nationalization" is rooted in misconception. It's perceived as defining a process by which one becomes a Moorish national, but in actuality the term denotes a process by which a national government takes control or ownership of private property, etc. This bastardization of the term is widely accepted and regurgitated by Moors who don't comprehend law. A vast majority of us were guilty of this.

It's the inverse of the way Moors bastardized the term "part and parcel" as "part and partial" by changing the term yet applying the same meaning. Whereas in "nationalization", the same term is applied yet the meaning is changed.

Things have only become more confusing with some Moors claiming the "correct" way to "nationalize" is to renounce U.S. citizenship and proclaim to be Moroccan under a fake Empire they "reinstated" yesterday — completely disregarding the real Empire's continuity as the Kingdom of Morocco, but that's a story for another day.

The truth is, the so-called "Moorish nationalization process" is patently frivolous. Additionally, since we don't have a functional de jure national government of our own that's capable of taking control of private property, there's no such legal process in the truest sense of the term nationalization.